Conclusion
Razdatok and the market represent two alternative institutional systems
which are formed in different societies to organize the economic life. Both
razdatok and market aconomies must provide effective production of goods and
services according to the demands of the population. If the USA represent a
classic example of the market economy, then Russia is a prominent example of
razdatok type of economy. The reasons for the formation of either type of
economy lie with the features of natural environment and means of its
development formed at the initial stages in the history of each state. In the
course of its development, each economy strengthens the features typical of it,
while the expediency of the appropriate economic system is reliably consolidated
in the consciousness and social values of generations.
Cyclic development is typical of all economic systems functioning
according to the laws of either market, or razdatok economy. Each institutional
cycle is characterized with economic institutions, types of organizations, and
management models of its own. The ones which make it possible to realize the
basic economic laws and provide for the sustainable economic development to the
largest extent. In a market economy such institutional environment provides for
the realization of law of supply and demand, while in a razdatok economy it
provides for the realization of the law of balancing sdacha and razdacha flows
for all the sectors of the state economy.
At periods when the formed elements of the institutional environment
can no longer guarantee the functioning of the basic economic laws, the
economic systems and all their branches enter the period of crisis, while the
system of economic relationships enters the period of institutional changes. The
common feature of these periods is the testing and the introduction of
institutional elements of alternative types of economies which make it possible
to overcome the crisis. For example, after the deep crisis of the 30s in the
countries with market economies, state regulation methods typical of razdatok
economies began to be actively used.
In the course of historic development of the razdatok economy in
Russia, at periods of institutional changes, introduction of methods of
organization of economic life from the current experince of economies of the
market type took place. Usually as well, the names of new types of
organizations and economic methods were borrowed to the extent that the names
of these historic periods were extended to the economic historiography of
Russia. For example, the period of institutional changes in Russian
razdatok-economy of the XII-XV centuries was called feodalism33 and the period
from the late XIX to the early XX century was called capitalism34 .
Wnen a new management model was found and all the elements of the
institutional environment were renewed, then the period of institutional
changes is finished and a new cycle began. It made it possible to provide the
functioning of the basic economic laws and the growth of economic effectivness
in changed historic conditions. For example, the essense of the previous period
of institutional changes in the economy of Russia which started in the end of
XIX century and finished in the early 30s of the XX century, was transition
from serfdom management model to the administrative one. The essence of the
current period of the institutional changes called the period of the market
reforms is the replacement of ineffective administrative management model and
the formation of a new mechanism regulating and balancing sdacha and razdacha
flows.
Ineffectiveness of the administrative management model in the
razdatok-economy at a period of crisis resulted from the character of
redistributive-bureaucratic financial mechanism which developed during the 70
and 80s. The functioning of the redistributive-bureaucratic mechanism was
described for the first time in this book. It led to the excessive growth of
the management expenses, reduction of money for the main production activity,
deterioration of the labor motivation on a mass scale, and reduction in the
quality of the public reproduction.
The current period of the market transformation in the razdatok-economy
of Russia has demonstrated the regularities of institutional renewal. At the
first stage the introduction of alternative economic institutions takes place.
At this period institutional environment is characterized by the presence of
elements of both market and razdatok nature as well as their various
combinations which exist on equal grounds. Some of them turn to be
institutionally stable and correspond to the razdatok nature of the
macroeconomic environment, while the others come into conflict with the
communal nature of the material and technological environment and the
domineering etatization potential of the population. The essence of the second
stage of institutional renewal is the modernization of the basic state property
institution on the basis of sustainable combinations of institutional elements.
These regularities were proved by the results of the
economic-sociological monitoring of the market experiment in 1993-1996.
At the first stage an attempt to introduce the private property
institution led to the emergence of private-administrative type of organization
which combined the market economic form and the administrative management model
typical of the crisis stage in the razdatok-economy. The divastating influence
of the redistributive-bureaucratic financial mechanism on organizations of this
type was worsened by the private form blocking the state control of the state
resources at their disposal.
At that period the creation of conditions for the development of
privatiozation potential of the population, for example, in housing did not
lead to the formation of a considerable group of private owners on a large
scale. On the eve of the market transformation privatization potential embraced
less than 40% of the population and was exhausted during the first three years
of the market reform.
The second stage of the institutional renewal in the razdatok-economy
in Russia begins in 1996 with the formation of new type of state-contracting
organizations which combine the state organization-and-legal form typical of
the razdatok-economy with the management model borrowed from the market
experiments.
The essence of a new contract management model is strict legal
isolation of bodies distributing the state resources and organizations using
these resources to perform work under the contract. Thus the functions of
customer secured to the federal, regional, and municipal bodies and the
functions of contractor given to the state-contracting organizations
(bureaucratic enterprises, municipal unitary enterprises, etc.) are divided.
The hypothesis on the essence of the current period in the
institutional changes in razdatok-economy of Russia is substantiated in this
book. Its essence is the modernization of the state property institution,
transition from the administrative management model with the state plan as the
main regulating mechanism to the contract management model where the sdacha and
razdacha flows are balanced by budget regulation means. At the same time the
old feedback mechnism in the form of complaints is renewed and new mechnisms
are created. Here the elections of representatives of legislative and executive
powers on the multyparty basis should be listed. Thus the instituitonal renewal
of the modern razdatok-economy is taking place which gives it possobilities for
further development.
The authors have the goal to prove this hypothesis within the framework
of a new theory of institutional development of razdatok-economies with Russia
being its prominent representative.